shot-button
E-paper E-paper
Home > News > India News > Article > After serving five year term man cleared of rape charge by HC

After serving five-year term, man cleared of rape charge by HC

Updated on: 14 June,2012 11:04 AM IST  | 
Agencies |

The Bombay High Court has acquitted a 32-year-old man in a 1999 rape case observing that a woman caught in the act of consensual sex outside her wedlock might resort to levelling allegations of rape to protect her character

After serving five-year term, man cleared of rape charge by HC

u00a0


While clearing Yogesh Shinde of the charges after he served five-year rigorous imprisonment for raping his neighbour's wife in Ulhasnagar in neighbouring Thane district, the court said it found "improbable" the prosecution charge and the version given by the victim.u00a0

u00a0


Shinde had filed the appeal after he served the jail term handed down to him by a Kalyan sessions court. Since the appeal was admitted earlier, it was heard on merits and the high court acquitted him on "benefit of doubt".u00a0
u00a0


Representational picture

According to prosecution, Shinde raped the woman at knife point behind her house on June 2, 1999 with the help of his friend. His friend was, however, acquitted by the trial court.u00a0
u00a0
"Though, in ordinary circumstances, a woman is not likely to make a false allegation of rape, when she is caught or is suspected of having had sexual intercourse with someone outside the wedlock, she is quite likely to try to protect her character by claiming that what was done was without her consent," Justice A M Thipsay recently observed.u00a0
u00a0
"Such a possibility is quite clear in the facts and circumstances of the present case where the victim's story when judged by ordinary yardstick, appears to be improbable," the judge noted while allowing the appeal filed by Shinde against his conviction by a sessions court in Kalyan.u00a0
u00a0
"Thus, even if it is assumed that sexual intercourse had taken place between the appellant and the victim, as alleged by her, the possibility of victim being a consenting party to the act, cannot be overruled.u00a0
u00a0
Certainly, at least a doubt that sexual intercourse, if any, between the appellant and the victim, was consensual, arises upon a consideration of the entire evidence", he observed.
u00a0
The judge said that the appellant was entitled to the "benefit of such reasonable doubt" and should have been acquitted.u00a0
u00a0
"The appreciation of evidence, as done by the trial court, was not proper or legal. The impugned order, therefore, needs to be interfered with, in the interest of justice," he said.u00a0
u00a0
While noting that the prosecution case mainly relied on the testimony of the victim, the court said that the victim's husband, though a witness, was not examined during the trial where other witnesses did not support the prosecution's case.u00a0
u00a0
Except for a scratch on right illiac crest--the upper border of the pelvic bone--the victim did not have any injury marks on her body and the doctor examined as witness was unable to give an opinion whether the victim had been subjected to any forcible sexual intercourse.u00a0
u00a0
The appellant too had not sustained any injury, the court said. "In her evidence, the woman also did not mention about the appellant having a knife or threatening her with a knife.u00a0
u00a0
From this, the recovery of knife, allegedly at the instance of the appellant, is rendered meaningless.u00a0
u00a0
It may, however, be observed, that even otherwise the evidence in that regard cannot be considered as satisfactory," the judge noted.u00a0
u00a0
The victim had admitted during cross examination that at the time of the incident, she and her husband had slept on a 'khat' in the house and was forcibly taken outside her room by the accused.u00a0
u00a0
The fact remains that it would be extremely difficult to accept that the victim could be taken away forcibly from her room when her husband was sleeping besides her, the judge observed.u00a0
u00a0
The victim had stated in the cross-examination that she was forced on the ground by the accused who raped her.u00a0
u00a0
She also admitted that there were stones on the ground. Had this been true then the prosecutrix would have expected to have at least some more scratches on her person.u00a0
u00a0
But, the medical evidence does not show the presence of any injuries, except a scratch on right iliac crest, the court noted.u00a0

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK