shot-button
E-paper E-paper
Home > Sports News > Cricket News > Article > By the way Ashwin ICC too feels Nagpur track was POOR

By the way Ashwin, ICC too feels Nagpur track was 'POOR'

Updated on: 01 December,2015 10:51 PM IST  | 
Agencies |

Match referee Jeff Crowe disagrees with India off-spinner R Ashwin’s defence of third India vs SA Test pitch in Jamtha

By the way Ashwin, ICC too feels Nagpur track was 'POOR'

Dubai: In a major embarrassment for BCCI, the ICC today rated the track at Nagpur which hosted the third cricket Test between India and South Africa as “poor”, triggering a review of the performance of the pitch under the ICC Pitch Monitoring Process.


Also Read: Ashwin replies to ex-Aussie pacer Rodney Hogg for Twitter jibe


In accordance with Clause 3 of the Process, ICC match referee Jeff Crowe submitted his report to the ICC expressing the concerns of the match officials over the performance of the pitch. This report has been forwarded to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which now has 14 days to provide its response.


Nagpur pitch rated as Umpire Bruce Oxenford (R) instructs a member of the groundstaff to sweep dust off the pitch during play on the first day of the third Test cricket match between India and South Africa at The Vidarbha Cricket Association Stadium in Nagpur. Pic/AFP

In accordance with Clause 3 of the Process, ICC Match Referee Jeff Crowe submitted his report to the ICC expressing the concerns of the match officials over the performance of the pitch. This report has been forwarded to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which now has 14 days to provide its response.

Also Read: Pitch controversy - Matthew Hayden hits back at Ravi Shastri

The pitch at the Vidarbha cricket ground at Jamtha, which is BCCI president Shashank Manohar's home association, saw ample turn from the very first day resulting in the game being over within three days. Manohar, interestingly, is currently also the ICC chairman.

After the BCCI submits its response, ICC's General Manager - Cricket, Geoff Allardice, and the ICC's Chief Match Referee, Ranjan Madugalle, will consider all the evidence, including studying video footage of the match, before reaching their decision on whether or not the pitch was poor and if so, whether a penalty should be imposed.

Also Read: Indian pitches most difficult I have faced, says du Plessis

The ICC will make no further comments until Allardice and Madugalle have reached their decision. The Nagpur Test was played from 25-27 November in which India scored 215 and 173, while South Africa scored 79 and 185.

The pitch received flak from many former cricketers, including Australia's Matthew Hayden, England's Michael Vaughan, and a host of others. However, the Indian captain Virat Kohli and Team director Ravi Shastri had strongly defended the pitch, saying that there was nothing wrong with the track.

The Nagpur Test pitch received flak from many former cricketers. However, the Indian captain Virat Kohli and Team director Ravi Shastri had strongly defended the pitch, saying that there was nothing wrong with the track. Off-spinner R Ashwin, who walked away with the man-of the match, said on Day Two: “What is the problem with spin and bounce? It is good even spin and bounce, isn't it? It is about skills for batsmen to play and counter”. 

Shastri had even gone to the extent of saying: “Which rule tells me that a ball can’t turn on day one? Where does it
tell me in the rulebook it can only swing and seam?” However, the visiting South African team had not lodged any complaints nor they made any critical comments on the pitch.

However, the visiting South African team had not lodged any complaints nor they made any critical comments on the pitch.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK