Supreme Court stays Delhi HC order on Black Money Law

Gautam Khaitan, an accused in the VVIP chopper deal scam, was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on January 26 for allegedly depositing money in offshore accounts

Supreme Court stays Delhi HC order on Black Money Law

Supreme Court. Pic/IANS

On May 21, 2019, the Supreme Court put a stay on the Delhi High Court order regarding the retrospective applicability of the Black Money Law. A Vacation Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra issued a notice to the lawyer of Gautam Khaitan, who is an accused in the VVIP chopper deal scam, and also facing charges in the black money case. The court has asked Gautam Khaitan's lawyer to file a reply within six weeks.

The #SupremeCourt on May 21 stayed the #DelhiHighCourt order regarding the retrospective applicability of the #BlackMoneyLaw.

Photo: IANS pic.twitter.com/eVLq4nuHRH
— IANS Tweets (@ians_india) May 21, 2019

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had contended before the apex court that the Delhi High Court order may affect other cases, too.

On May 16, 2019, the Delhi High Court passed an order preventing the government and the Income Tax Department from initiating any punitive action against advocate Gautam Khaitan under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.

Gautam Khaitan, an accused in the VVIP chopper deal scam, was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on January 26 for allegedly depositing money in offshore accounts. Later, he challenged his arrest contending the Centre's notification, which stated the Act would come into force from July 1, 2015, instead of April 1, 2016 (before it became operational), was ultra vires.

Khaitan also contended unnecessary action had been initiated against him under the Act for assets that didn't exist before the law came into force.

The high court queried the Centre on the applicability of the retrospective effect of the Act, from July 2015, till its enactment in April 2016, to take into consideration undisclosed foreign income and assets.

The high court said, "... at this stage, we are prima facie of the considered view that, the official respondents could not have exercised powers granted to them under the provisions of Sections 85 and 86 of the said Act, prior to its enactment itself..."

Earlier, on March 25, the ED filed a charge sheet in the money laundering case. The agency said Khaitan was "controlling" the modus operandi and was responsible for routing money, misusing his connections and clients, including the ones inherited from his father, to launder money through a variety of accounts in Dubai, Mauritius, Singapore, Tunisia, Switzerland, the UK, and India.

The ED officials said that the accounts included those belonging to his undisclosed shell companies outside India.

The ED had filed a money laundering case against Khaitan and others based on a case lodged by the I-T Department under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act. Read the full story here.