A division bench of Justice Gautam Patel and Justice Neela Gokhale, in its order of April 25, said the questions of identity and gender perception do not happen at a “biologically definable point”
The petitioner, from TISS, sought to change their name and gender in the education records of the institute. Representation pic
Responding to a plea by a transgender person, the Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to instruct all educational institutions in the state to allow retrospective changes of name and gender in their records.
ADVERTISEMENT
A division bench of Justice Gautam Patel and Justice Neela Gokhale, in its order of April 25, said the questions of identity and gender perception do not happen at a “biologically definable point”.
The petitioner, an alumnus of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), identifies as a transgender and sought to change their name and gender in the education records of the institute. In 2013, the petitioner received an MA in Development Studies from the TISS with their original feminine name.
Also Read: Misleading information has potential to fan separatist movements: Bombay HC
In 2015, the petitioner adopted another name, self-identifying as transgender and applied to the TISS for a new certificate reflecting the changes in name and gender. When there was no response from the institute, the petitioner approached the HC. The high court said that earlier orders passed by the Supreme Court “direct us towards greater inclusiveness and acceptance of individuality and individual traits.”
“These are not to be compromised because of some bureaucratic requirements,” the division bench said. “This is a case of denial of a human being’s self-identity and self-identification. That cannot be done and cannot be permitted. Nor can an institute be permitted to force upon the petitioner a name, identity or gender that the petitioner has chosen to reject in preference to some other,” it added.
On the TISS’s stand that the petitioner first produce earlier educational records with the new name and gender, HC said this was not just obstructive but also a denial of the petitioner’s rights.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
