shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mumbai Panvel court rejects pre arrest bail plea of 6 in property case

Mumbai: Panvel court rejects pre-arrest bail plea of 6 in property case

Updated on: 30 April,2021 08:53 AM IST  |  Mumbai
PTI |

In their bail plea, the applicants said that the FIR against them was filed based on the complaint lodged by the complainant to pressure them into selling the disputed flat at cheaper rate by using police machinery.

Mumbai: Panvel court rejects pre-arrest bail plea of 6 in property case

This picture has been used for representational purpose

A court at Panvel in Maharashtra's Raigad district has rejected the pre-arrest bail plea of six partners of a Navi Mumbai-based construction firm in a case of cheating related to a property.


Kharghar police in Navi Mumbai had recently registered an FIR against the six accused under various sections of the IPC, including cheating, and also under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the promotion of construction, sale, management and transfer) Act.


Additional Sessions Judge N B Lavte, in his order passed recently, said the applicants do not deserve bail at this stage.


In their bail plea, the applicants said that the FIR against them was filed based on the complaint lodged by the complainant to pressure them into selling the disputed flat at cheaper rate by using police machinery.

They also submitted that they had not agreed to sale the flat to the complainant at Rs 45,75,000 and the sale price of the property as per the agreement signed between them was Rs 92,00,000.

They alleged that the complainant cooked up a story, claiming that the agreed sale price of the flat was Rs 45,75,000.

The complainant in this case is Balvantrai Thakkar (71) and the applicant partners of the construction firm Raj Homes-SV Developers are Suresh Virji Thakkar, Shankar Virji Thakkar, Shantilal Virji Thakkar, Giris Gangji Shah, Kantibai Gangji Shah and Yogesh Natwarlal Thakkar.

In the order, the court observed that the applicants had criminal antecedents and a similar offence was registered against them earlier.

'Considering the gravity of the offence and the criminal antecedents of applicants and the likelihood of their interference in the investigation, the applicants cannot be granted anticipatory bail,' the court said.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK