shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mumbai HC seeks views of Maharashtra and Central govts on video recording of proceedings under SCST Act

Mumbai: HC seeks views of Maharashtra and Central govts on video recording of proceedings under SC/ST Act

Updated on: 20 November,2023 04:00 PM IST  |  Mumbai
mid-day online correspondent |

The Bombay High Court has sought input from the Central and Maharashtra governments regarding the video recording of proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Mumbai: HC seeks views of Maharashtra and Central govts on video recording of proceedings under SC/ST Act

Representational Picture/iStock

The Bombay High Court has sought input from the Central and Maharashtra governments regarding the video recording of proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court, led by Chief Justice D K Upadhaya and S V Kotwal, aims to clarify uncertainties surrounding the Act's provision on video recording proceedings.


The case, initially referred by Justice Sadhana Jadhav in 2019, involves accused doctors implicated in the tragic suicide of Dr. Payal Tadvi, raising questions about the scope and necessity of video recording in judicial proceedings.


The HC had noted that the Act didn't mention what is to be considered as proceedings and that the word "proceedings" was not defined. A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhaya and S V Kotwal on October 26 requested the Additional Solicitor General of India and the Advocate General of Maharashtra to address the court on the issue as it raises important questions.


The high court also appointed advocate Mayur Khandeparkar as amicus curiae (to assist the court). The bench posted the matter for further hearing on December 15.

The single bench of Justice Jadhav in its 2019 order had said the issue regarding the implementation of this provision (section 15A-10) of the Act deserves to be referred to a larger bench to decide if proceedings would also amount to judicial proceedings, if it would be necessary to video record all such judicial proceedings even if the same are held in open courts, if hearing on bail pleas was proceedings as contemplated in the Act.

The bench was hearing bail pleas filed by three accused doctors Hema Ahuja, Bhakti Mehare and Ankita Khandelwal accused of abetting the suicide of their junior Dr Payal Tadvi in 2019.

Tadvi, a second-year postgraduate medical student attached to the civic-run BYL Nair hospital in Mumbai, committed suicide on May 22, 2019, in her hostel room after allegedly leaving behind a suicide note blaming the three seniors.

Dr Tadvi's family had alleged that the trio had harassed and ragged her and had also made casteist slurs against her. The three accused were arrested and later released on bail. (With inputs from PTI)

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK