shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mehul Choksi moves Bombay HC seeking to keep in abeyance EDs fugitive proceedings

Mehul Choksi moves Bombay HC seeking to keep in abeyance ED's fugitive proceedings

Updated on: 19 November,2021 08:07 PM IST  |  Mumbai
PTI |

Choksi, an accused in the Punjab National Bank fraud case worth Rs 14,500 crore, moved the High Court through senior lawyer Vijay Aggarwal

Mehul Choksi moves Bombay HC seeking to keep in abeyance ED's fugitive proceedings

Mehul Choksi. File Pic

Businessman Mehul Choksi has moved the Bombay High Court seeking that the proceedings initiated against him by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which has sought that he be declared a fugitive economic offender (FEO), be kept in abeyance.


Choksi, an accused in the Punjab National Bank fraud case worth Rs 14,500 crore, moved the High Court through senior lawyer Vijay Aggarwal. The ED, in 2019, had moved an application before the PMLA court seeking that Choksi be declared an FEO under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018.


As per the Act, a person can be declared a FEO if a warrant has been issued against him for an offence involving Rs 100 crore or more and if the person has left the country and refuses to return. Choksi, in his application, said that he could not be declared as a fugitive accused person, since he had not left India to avoid criminal prosecution, but had left well before any FIRs were registered against him.


The businessman said that in July 2021, he was granted bail by a court in Dominica and had been permitted to travel to Antigua and Barbuda for medical treatment.
However, Choksi was facing difficulties in travelling because of the ongoing proceedings before the special PMLA court in the city, the petition stated. Choksi's lawyer Aggarwal told a single bench presided over by Justice S K Shinde that the Dominica court had passed the order permitting him to travel for medical treatment in the presence of Indian authorities.

He further said that it was unfair for the Indian authorities to argue that Choksi was intentionally refusing to return to India. Choksi was not refusing to return to India to face criminal prosecution but was being prevented from doing so due to his inability to travel as a result of his medical condition, the lawyer argued. Advocate Hiten Venegaokar, who appeared for the ED, opposed Choksi's application and sought time to file a detailed reply. The High Court granted the central agency time to file a reply and posted the matter for further hearing to December 21.

Also Read: Elgar case accused Varavara Rao need not surrender till December 2: Bombay High Court

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK