Experts says police officers still rely on age-old methods of evidence collection instead of forensic and scientific ones that make for a conclusive case against the accused
Dr Indrajit Khandekar, professor of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, addresses police officers during a session
A two-day training on usage of forensic tools was recently held for state Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and police officers of assistant commissioner of police (ACP) rank with an intent to improve conviction rate in the state.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dr Indrajit Khandekar, professor of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Sevagram, who conducted the sessions, in
an exclusive conversation with mid-day admitted that cops are still using conventional methods of investigation and are not moulded in understanding forensics and its tools, which could be used as scientific evidence extracted from crime scene investigation, thereby helping in conviction of the accused.
Dr Khandekar said, “The police even today are being trained as per the age-old method of crime detection, but the need of the hour is that investigation not be limited to detection of crime, but to ensure that such detection is done with foolproof collection of direct and indirect evidences which can used as prosecution evidence in the court of law.”
“The entire hierarchy of police department should be trained and tuned for using forensic and other scientific analysis and technology for investigation so that
they can use the same to analyse the crime scene, collect evidence/samples, and most importantly to challenge the results when they are inconclusive, which is not happening today,” he said.
Speaking on some of the topics that were discussed during the sessions, he said, “The training topics were based on numerous court judgments in which accused were acquitted and courts had elaborated in its ratio decidendi (the reason) for passing such an order. We also talked about serious bodily offences such as murder, attempt to murder, grievous hurt, dowry death, acid attack, sexual assault including POSCO cases etc.”
Elaborating further, Dr Khandekar said, “In a dowry harassment case from Baramati, the burn victim has stated that her in-laws poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. As the victim died while undergoing treatment, the police relied on the autopsy report to ascertain the cause of death but failed to prove the use of kerosene as they had not collected the piece of cloth she was wearing at the time of incident. The forensic analysis of the cloth and even the burnt skin of the victim could have helped in ascertaining the use of kerosene.”
Another glaring practice that was discussed was matching blood group instead of DNA from the seminal fluid in cases of rape and sexual assault. “During trial, the
suspect may raise concerns that the blood could be anyone’s and not the victim’s. Hence, the police need to be trained to raise appropriate queries such as getting DNA analysis of the seminal fluid, which could be used as evidence to nail the accused,” explained Dr Khandekar.
Similarly, in case of murder, attempt to murder etc where the police trace the blood stained weapon used in the crime, along with blood-soaked clothes of victim and accused, they (police) usually tend to raise query asking FSL (forensic science laboratory) to merely match the blood group of the deceased and accused, with that seen on weapon, rather than asking for specific DNA analysis of the same, which would put the onus on the accused to prove his presence at crime scene.
When asked about forensic reports coming inconclusive, Dr Khandekar explained, “There are provisions under the law, wherein police with permission of court, can re-collect the samples and send the same for analysis, instead of going ahead with an inconclusive report, which benefits the accused. And this is possible, with proper communication between the Forensic Science Laboratory and concerned police officials, probing the case, as many a times, the FSL reports do not justify the reason for such ‘inconclusive’ report, a practice which should be done away with.”
A senior officer from CID, who attended the session, said, “Crime scene investigation today focus more on collection of evidence to make a water tight case for the prosecution. Apart from nabbing the accused, the primary responsibility is also collection of evidence. I feel the session was interesting and gave a lot of insights to the core area of investigation. Today, police investigation also focuses more on ‘reasoning’ which helps in court proceedings.”
Reasons for such lacunas:
No proper practical base-oriented training to police officials.
Most of the time the training is theoretical without any application to practical day to day scenarios.
The training manuals available at present do not address how to remove the existing problems that are occurring while investigating the case. Thereby problems remain as it is.
What should be done (Solution)
1. The committee should analyse the actual problems that are occurring in day-to-day crime investigation and suggest the ways to solve the existing problem.
2. Training manuals shall be updated to address the various practical issues.
3. Training shall include a practical approach rather than teaching theoretical concepts that do not have much practical relevance.
4. Training shall be focused to address the queries that are lingering in the minds of police officials.
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
