shot-button
Lake Levels Lake Levels
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Bombay HC raps magistrate for not complying with order

Bombay HC raps magistrate for not complying with order

Updated on: 21 August,2024 07:15 AM IST  |  Mumbai
Agencies |

The bench said the magistrate had only given excuses for not completing the trial within the stipulated period

Bombay HC raps magistrate for not complying with order

The case pertains to a dowry harassment. File pic

Listen to this article
Bombay HC raps magistrate for not complying with order
x
00:00

The Bombay High Court has come down heavily on a magistrate for not complying with its 2021 order directing the trial to be expedited in a dowry harassment case, noting that her excuses for non-compliance were “feeble”.


A division bench of Justice A S Gadkari and Justice Neela Gokhale, in its order of August 9, said the magistrate, presiding over a Navi Mumbai judicial magistrate’s court, paid scant respect to the high court directives, and it seemed that she was not serious in doing her work. A copy of the order was made available on Tuesday. The bench said the magistrate had only given excuses for not completing the trial within the stipulated period.



The case pertains to a matrimonial dispute and a dowry harassment case. “We are unable to accept the feeble excuses given by the judicial officer in not complying with the directions issued by this court and paying scant respect to it. It appears to us that the judicial officer is not serious in performing her judicial work,” the court said.


The bench directed that the matter, including the magistrate’s report, be placed before the high court’s administrative committee for appropriate directions. The order was passed in an application filed by a man facing a dowry harassment case, claiming that despite the high court’s order in 2021 for the trial to be expedited, the magistrate was yet to conclude the trial. In February 2021, the high court directed the concerned magistrate court to expedite the trial and give its decision within four months. The order was passed in a petition filed by the man seeking discharge in the case. The man withdrew his plea after the order to expedite the trial was passed.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK