shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > HC rejects MMRDA petition challenging Mumbai Metro fare hike

HC rejects MMRDA petition challenging Mumbai Metro fare hike

Updated on: 24 June,2014 06:10 PM IST  | 
PTI |

The Bombay High Court has dismissed the MMRDA's plea for a stay on the rates fixed for the Mumbai Metro by Mumbai Metro One Pvt Ltd (MMOPL) and asked the Centre to direct the fare fixation committee to expeditiously fix the tariff

HC rejects MMRDA petition challenging Mumbai Metro fare hike

Mumbai metro

The Bombay High Court has asked the Centre to direct the fare fixation committee to expeditiously fix the tariff of the 11.4-km Mumbai Metro rail corridor which connects Versova to Ghatkopar.


All the partners in the consortium are members of the fare fixation committee which has been asked to decide the fares of the Metro which became operational this month.


Justice R D Dhanuka also rejected the petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) challenging the fares of the Metro.


Mumbai metro fare chart

At present, Mumbai Metro One Private Ltd (MMOPL) is offering a promotional fare of Rs 10 for all the destinations till July 9.

MMRDA, a state agency, and Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure, both of which are part of MMOPL, have a disagreement over the fares.

While the state government wants the minimum fare of Rs 9 and maximum fare of Rs 13 for the rail corridor, its operator MMOPL has announced higher fares ranging between Rs 10 and Rs 40.

According to MMRDA, fares had been decided collectively by all the stake-holders earlier and RInfra cannot change them unilaterally without following a due procedure.

The court held that the arbitration tribunal would decide on the validity and legality of a resolution passed by MMOPL, which is running the Metro, fixing the fares.

However, the arbitrators are yet to be appointed for this purpose.

The court had asked the parties to suggest names of arbitrators. However, they have not arrived at any consensus on the names of arbitrators to form a tribunal.

The judge was of the view that the agreement between the parties of the consortium which had built the Metro was in conflict with the Metro Act.

"The project is not set up for private profit. It is a joint project by the public and the private sector for the people. Therefore, they cannot raise the fares arbitrarily," MMRDA counsel E P Bharucha argued.

Fares can be revised only after a nod from fare fixation committee, he said.

Reliance Infrastructure argued that fares decided by the government had been imposed on the company.

"We are much cheaper compared to the fares of BEST municipal buses and the Railways. The bus fare on the same route (between Versova and Ghatkopar) is Rs 25. One has to pay Rs 60 for an air-conditioned bus, Rs 163 for an auto, Rs 204 for a taxi. We charge only Rs 40," its lawyer Iqbal Chhagla argued.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK