shot-button
Podcast Banner	Podcast Banner
Home > Entertainment News > Web Series News > Article > M Night Shyamalan faces USD 81 million copyright trial over Servant web series

M Night Shyamalan faces USD 81 million copyright trial over Servant web series

Updated on: 16 January,2025 07:01 AM IST  |  Mumbai
Agencies |

Francesca Gregorini is suing Shyamalan and Apple for $81 million, alleging that the show stole key elements from her 2013 movie, The Truth about Emanuel

M Night Shyamalan faces USD 81 million copyright trial over Servant web series

M Night Shyamalan. Pic/AFP

Listen to this article
M Night Shyamalan faces USD 81 million copyright trial over Servant web series
x
00:00

Filmmaker M Night Shyamalan is facing a trial over allegations that he copied from an independent film to make the streaming show, Servant. The show streams on Apple TV+. Francesca Gregorini, an Italy born director, is suing Shyamalan and Apple for $81 million, alleging that the show stole key elements from her 2013 movie, The Truth about Emanuel.


Her attorney, Patrick Arenz, showed jurors clips of both projects during his opening statement on Tuesday in federal court in Riverside, California. As per reports, he argued that both depict a delusional mother who cares for a doll as though it is a real baby, and a nanny who is complicit in the delusion. “This is a simple case,” Arenz told the jury. “There would be no Servant without Emanuel”.


Shyamalan sat behind the defense attorneys, alongside producer Taylor Latham and Matt Cherniss, the head of programming at Apple TV+. Tony Basgallop, the British writer who created the series, sat at the defense counsel table, while Gregorini sat with her lawyers at the plaintiffs’ table. When it was the defense’s turn, attorney Brittany Amadi argued that Basgallop began developing the show years before The Truth about Emanuel was released, and that those involved with the show never drew on the film.


Gregorini sued in January 2020, shortly after Servant, debuted on the platform. A federal judge initially threw out the case a few months later, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals revived it in 2022, finding a genuine dispute over whether the two works are “substantially similar”.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK