17 January,2017 06:24 PM IST | | PTI
The BCCI's move to have Ranji Trophy matches at neutral venues failed miserably in its first attempt, according to leading domestic players who say the idea did not work due to apathy of the host associations and poor planning
Mumbai's Shreyas Iyer during Day Three of the Ranji final vs Gujarat. Pic/Prakash Parsekar
New Delhi: The BCCI's move to have Ranji Trophy matches at neutral venues failed miserably in its first attempt, according to leading domestic players who say the idea did not work due to apathy of the host associations and poor planning.
The BCCI had introduced the concept to make the tournament more competitive by negating the home advantage that teams earlier used to exploit and exposing the players to different conditions.
"The idea was good but the implementation was third class. Most host associations did not show interest in
organising matches for other teams. The facilities were poor, be it providing us with good wickets, adequate balls or serving decent food. It could have been handled much better," domestic cricket veteran Rajat Bhatia told PTI.
The Delhi-based cricketer has played for three states and is currently with Rajasthan.
Bhatia, who played only four matches this season owing to family issues, was simply scathing in his criticism.
"The system was introduced to stop teams from taking undue home advantage with games often finishing inside two
days. But the quality did not improve even though games were held at neutral venues.
"Take our match against Assam in Vizag for example. The wicket was not fit enough for a First-Class match and
therefore the match was over well inside three days. And it was just two weeks before an international match. The
groundsmen did not have much to say when we asked them why we were made to play on such a poor surface," the 37-year-old said.
Pacers dominated in that match with Pankaj Singh taking a nine-wicket haul and Rajasthan winning the game by an innings and eight runs.
Another issue for the players was scheduling of the games as they had to travel to remote areas of the country with limited time in hand.
"Scheduling was a big problem. Sometimes there was just a three-day gap between games and we had to travel to places which were not easily accessible, which meant we had to spend a lot of time on the road in buses," said Gujarat and India spinner Axar Patel.
Lack of interest for the games was another reason why Axar did not like the neutral venue initiative.
"What is the point of having matches in places where nobody comes to see us play? At least we had a decent turnout
when we were playing at home. I hope we go back to the home and away format next season," said the left-arm spinner, who is out of action with a wrist injury.
