28 January,2021 06:50 AM IST | New Delhi | Agencies
This picture has been used for representational purpose
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the Bombay High Court order which acquitted a man under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act saying "groping a minor's breast without âskin to skin contact' cannot be termed as sexual assault".
A bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian stayed the high court order after Attorney General K K Venugopal mentioned the matter. The top court also issued notice to Maharashtra government and permitted the AG to file an appeal against the January 19 verdict of the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court. The verdict said that groping a minor's breast without "skin to skin contact" cannot be termed as sexual assault as defined under the POCSO Act.
It said that since the man groped the child without removing her clothes the offence cannot be termed as sexual assault but it does constitute the offence of outraging a woman's modesty under IPC section 354.
The high court had modified the order of a sessions court, which had sentenced a 39-year-old man to three years of imprisonment for sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl. It held that mere groping will not fall under the definition of sexual assault.
ALSO READ
AAP says Parvesh Verma giving voters cash in Kejriwal's New Delhi segment, BJP leader refutes charge
NDA leaders meet at Nadda's residence to celebrate Vajpayee's birth centenary
Atishi accuses BJP of distributing cash to voters in Kejriwal's New Delhi constituency
Congress leaders extends Christmas greetings
Two injured in firing incident at Delhi's Aman Vihar
As per the prosecution and the minor victim's testimony in court, in December 2016, the accused, one Satish, had taken the girl to his house in Nagpur on the pretext of giving her something to eat. Once there, he gripped her breast and attempted to remove her clothes, the high court had recorded in her verdict. However, since he groped her without removing her clothes, the offence cannot be termed as sexual assault and, instead, constitutes the offence of outraging a woman's modesty under IPC section 354, the high court had held.
While IPC section 354 entails a minimum imprisonment for one year, sexual assault under the POCSO Act entails a minimum imprisonment of three years. The sessions court had sentenced the man to three years of imprisonment for the offences under POCSO Act as also under IPC section 354. The high court, however, acquitted him under the POCSO Act while upholding his conviction under IPC section 354.
