21 December,2020 11:31 AM IST | Prayagraj | IANS
Photo used for representational purpose
A minor error made an Uttar Pradesh man spend eight more months in prison even after he was granted bail by a court.
The mistake was that his middle name 'Kumar' had not been mentioned in the bail order.
The applicant's name in the remand sheet was Vinod Kumar Baruaar, while the court order mentioned his name as Vinod Baruaar.
The jail superintendent kept a man in illegal confinement for eight months only because of this error.
ALSO READ
Jhansi hospital fire: Two more die, toll reaches 17
'Well-planned conspiracy by UP CM Adityanath, BJP-RSS': Congress
Three dead as GPS navigation error leads car to fall from bridge into river
Three killed in clashes during violent protest against Sambhal mosque survey
UP: Car rams into stationary tractor in Raebareli; 3 killed, 8 injured
Vinod had filed a bail application before the high court and on April 9, the court directed his release on bail.
But he was not released as the jail authorities refused to comply with the release order passed in this case because of the discrepancy in the name.
The court came to know about his confinement when he moved an application for name correction.
While hearing the application, the court took serious note of his confinement due to small technicality and directed the release of the applicant.
The court then summoned the jail superintendent of Siddhartha Nagar district jail and observed: "It is on small technicality that the jail superintendent has flouted the bail order of high court by refusing to release the applicant."
The court directed that after complying with the order, the jail superintendent will appear before it and explain why appropriate departmental inquiry may not be recommended against him.
Jail superintendent, Rakesh Singh, appeared before the court and filed an affidavit stating the applicant had been released from the prison on December 8.
The court took the affidavit of compliance on record.
Justice J.J. Munir said: "This court has perused the affidavit filed by the jail superintendent. The explanation furnished for non-compliance of this court's order, and, in consequence, delaying release of the applicant is reluctantly accepted."
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.
Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever