27 October,2020 04:19 PM IST | Mumbai | IANS
Indian magazine editor Tarun Tejpal (C) is escorted by police officials after a hearing at The High Court in Goa on March 4, 2014. Pic/AFP
Extending the deadline for the completion of the trial in the sexual assault case against journalist Tarun Tejpal to March 31, 2021, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said that if he were to agree to a trial through videoconference, it would be over within two months.
While the complainant woman had sought her cross examination via videoconference amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Tejpal had strongly objected to it.
A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan noted that the judge conducting the trial had cited reasonable ground for the extension of the trial in the matter. The bench said that 31 witnesses were yet to be examined in the matter.
ALSO READ
Supreme Court drops contempt case against Prashant Bhushan, Tarun Tejpal
HC reserves order in Goa govt's application against Tarun Tejpal's acquittal
In-camera hearing of Tejpal's plea in sexual assault case to be heard on Jan 24
SC judge recuses from hearing Tejpal's plea in sexual assault case
SC to hear Tejpal's plea for in-camera hearing in sexual assault case on Jan 21
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Goa government, seconded the court observations in the matter. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal insisted that the trial should not be extended.
The bench told Sibal: "You are not agreeable to a trial through videoconference, otherwise it will be over within two months."
The bench said that virtual hearing in the case had also been requested to by the state government. Mehta said that the request for virtual hearing had been made.
After a brief hearing in the matter, the apex court extended the trial deadline till March 31, 2021 from earlier December 31, 2020.
On October 5, Mehta had contended before a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan and comprising Justices MR Shah and R Subhash Reddy that the prosecutrix was suffering from lung infection and was thereby avoiding travel during the ongoing pandemic.
Sibal had strongly objected to the trial through videoconference and argued that the woman did not want to face trial and insisted she had no lung problem.
Justice Shah then had queried Sibal: "What is wrong with a videoconference? We are also hearing cases through videoconference."
Sibal had contended that the accused wanted expeditious completion of the trial and reiterated that his client was against any extension in the trial completion deadline. Mehta also supported the cross examination through videoconference.
The bench issued notice to Tarun Tejpal on a plea filed by Goa Police to seek extension in time for completing the trial in the 2013 sexual assault case against him.
The bench allowed Tejpal time to file his reply and posted the matter for further hearing on Thursday.
On August 19, 2019, while refusing to quash the charges against Tejpal, the top court had ordered for expeditious trial in the case.
The court had earlier issued a bailable warrant to secure the woman's presence before it, as her absence for cross examination was holding up the trial.
The woman had moved the High Court to seek suspension of the warrant, and she was granted this relief. The High Court observed that unless the woman approaches the top court and seeks extension, there is nothing much either the High Court or the trial court could do.
The prosecutor had informed the court that the state government is making all efforts to move the top court in the matter.
The High Court was informed that the woman was facing problems to visit Goa from Delhi amid the pandemic. She also cited respiratory infection, which made her prone to health hazards if she were to travel amid the pandemic.
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.
Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever