28 August,2019 11:39 AM IST | New Delhi | mid-day online correspondent
Supreme Court
New Delhi: on Wednesday, the Supreme Court sought responses from the Jammu and Kashmir administration and the Centre on a plea seeking the removal of restrictions imposed on journalists that were imposed after Article 370 was scrapped. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi issued notice on the plea filed by the Executive Editor of Kashmir Times, Anuradha Bhasin.
The bench, also comprising S A Nazeer and Justices S A Bobde asked Jammu and Kashmir administration and the Centre to file their responses on Anuradha Bhasin's plea within seven days. In the plea, Anuradha Bhasin, Executive Editor of Kashmir Times has sought directions for the restoration of all modes of communication, including the Internet, mobile and landline services, throughout the state in order to provide an enabling environment for media to practise its profession.
The Supreme Court also decided to examine the legal challenge against the Centre's decision to abrogate Article 370 in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, which gave special status to the state and referred the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench. The apex court issued notices to the Jammu and Kashmir administration and the Centre on a batch of pleas challenging the Presidential order by which Article 370 was abrogated.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was not in agreement with the Centre decision of there was no need for issuance of notice in the matter as Attorney General K K Venugopal and Solicitor General were marking their presence in the court. "We will refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench", the bench also comprising justices S A Nazeer and S A Bobde stated while not accepting the arguments that the issuance of notice will have a "cross-border repercussion". The Attorney General stated whatever is being said by this court is sent before the United Nations. As the counsel appearing for both sides were involved in arguments and counter-arguments, the bench added, "We know what to do, we have passed the order, we are not going to change".
ALSO READ
Fresh plea in SC seeks probe into US indictment of Adani
Supreme Court allows multibillion-dollar class action to proceed against Meta
Important matters heard by Supreme Court on Nov 22
Supreme Court to rule on removal of 'Secular' and 'Socialist' from Constitution
Supreme Court stresses on tree census in Taj Trapezium Zone
Also Read: Abrogation of Article 370 not political issue, but national, says VP
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates