06 April,2018 02:00 PM IST | New Delhi | Agencies
The Centre's argument that Aadhaar would help curb ills like terrorism and banking frauds on Thursday did not find favour with the Supreme Court, which said the bank officials were "hand-in-glove" with fraudsters and scams do not happen because the culprits are unknown.
The top court also questioned the government for asking the entire population to link their mobile phones with Aadhaar "just to catch a few terrorists" and asked what would happen if the authorities, through administrative orders, ask the citizens to part with their DNA, semen and blood samples as part of their Aadhaar demographics.
A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of Aadhaar and its enabling 2016 law, prima facie disagreed with the submission and said Aadhaar was "not the solution" to banking frauds.
ALSO READ
Punjab: Gold worth 1.50 crore found from passenger at Amritsar airport
Over six lakh devotees visit Sabarimala in nine days; revenue touches Rs 41 crore
Bad timing: Fraudsters call senior Indore cop during press briefing to pull off 'digital arrest'
Individuals among us carrying out anti-national religious conversions: Adityanath
Ladki Bahin scheme, religious polarisation may have played role: Sharad Pawar on Mahayuti victory
"There is no doubt about the identity of fraudsters. The bank knows whom it is giving loan and it is the bank officials who are hand-in-glove with the fraudsters. Aadhaar can do little to stop it," the bench, which also comprised justices A K Sikri, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, said.
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever