Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan was coming to create caste divide: UP

Supreme Court

Kerala-based journalist Siddique Kappan, arrested on his way to Hathras where a young Dalit woman had died after allegedly being gang-raped, was going there under the garb of journalism with a very determined design to create caste divide and disturb law and order situation, the Uttar Pradesh government said in the Supreme Court today.

In an affidavit filed in the top court, the state government has alleged that Siddique Kappan is the office secretary of Popular Front of India (PFI) and was using a journalist cover by showing identity card of a Kerela-based newspaper which was closed in 2018.

Opposing the plea filed by Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) questioning Siddique Kappan's arrest and seeking his bail, the state has said it is not maintainable and the petitioner has no locus as the accused is already in touch with his advocates and relatives and he himself can file proceedings through his lawyers.

It is revealed during investigation that he along with other PFI activists and their student wing (Campus Front of India) leaders were going to Hathras under the garb of Journalism with a very determined design to create a caste divide and disturb law and order situation were found carrying incriminating material, the affidavit said.

The matter came up for hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Uttar Pradesh, said they have filed an affidavit.

Last time there was misreporting. I am worried about the inaccurate reporting, the CJI said, adding, the reports said that the journalist was refused relief.

The bench asked senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who was appearing for KUWJ, to go through the reply filed by Uttar Pradesh and file rejoinder.

You have the right to file bail and you read the reply and then we will hear you completely, the bench said.

The bench said the state has no objection to an advocate approaching the accused to get his signature for availing the judicial relief.

List after one week. In the meantime, the accused person's signature can be obtained in jail for taking recourse in courts, the bench said.

Kapil Sibal said that lawyers were earlier restrained from approaching Siddique Kappan to get his signature.

Tushar Mehta countered Kapil Sibal's contention and said they were neither stopped earlier and nor there is any opposition on this.

Siddique Kappan was arrested on October 5 while he was on his way to Hathras, home to the young Dalit woman who died after being allegedly gang-raped by four upper-caste men.

The police had said it has arrested four people having links with the PFI in Mathura and identified the arrested persons as Siddique Kappan from Malappuram, Atiq-ur Rehman from Muzaffarnagar, Masood Ahmed from Bahraich and Alam from Rampur.

In its affidavit filed in the top court, the state government has said that Siddique Kappan is not in illegal custody/confinement but is in judicial custody.

The petitioner has resorted to falsehood and has made several false statements on oath only to sensationalise the case which would become clear on perusal of the following facts, said the affidavit, filed by senior superintendent of jail, District Jail Mathura.

The person in custody namely Siddique Kappan is the Office Secretary of Popular Front of India (PFI) using a journalist cover by showing identity card of a Kerela based newspaper...which was closed in 2018, it claimed.

It alleged when Siddique Kappan was brought by special task force (STF) to Delhi for probe, he misled the police by giving wrong residential address which was found invalid and he did not assist in the investigation and gave misleading details.

It alleged that KUWJ has concealed the fact that a lawyer hired by them was appearing before the magistrate at Mathura on October 6 and had full knowledge of the time and place of production of the accused.

It said a completely false narrative is being made that Siddique Kappan is not being permitted to talk to relatives or lawyers as during judicial custody, he has interacted with his family members on three occasions on phone on his written request.

It is pertinent to note that accused Siddique Kappan has never requested to meet any relative or any lawyer nor has file any such application before the competent court/jail authorities till date, it said.

The affidavit said STF has been conducting detailed probe and have been filing progress reports before the state government from which it has been revealed that further incriminating evidence has been found against all the four accused including the accused Siddique Kappan

It is submitted that during the investigation conducted so far, the evidence of the accused having links with banned organizations has emerged, it claimed.

It said out of four persons arrested on October 5, the remaining three have filed bail pleas which were rejected by the court.

The FIR has been filed under various provisions of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) against four people having alleged links with PFI.

PFI had been accused in the past of funding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act across the country earlier this year.

Hathras has been in the news following the death of a 19-year-old Dalit woman who was allegedly gang-raped on September 14, 2020, in a village in the district.

Her cremation at night by the authorities, allegedly without the parents' consent, had triggered widespread outrage.

Keep scrolling to read more news

Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.

Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever