RSS remarks: Mumbai court rejects Javed Akhtar's plea against summons issued by magistrate

Javed Akhtar. File Photo

A sessions court here on Monday rejected veteran lyricist-poet Javed Akhtar's plea challenging summons issued against him by a magistrate in connection with a criminal case filed by a lawyer over his alleged objectionable remarks against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

The lawyer, Santosh Dubey, had in October 2021 filed a complaint against Akhtar before the metropolitan magistrate court in suburban Mulund under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 (defamation) and 500 (punishment for defamation).

The magistrate, after hearing arguments of both sides, had issued summons to the veteran lyricist in December last year. The 78-year-old Bollywood personality, through his lawyer, filed a petition before the sessions court against the summons.

"The session court has rejected the revision application filed by renowned writer Javed Akhtar against the Mulund court's order," Dubey said. Akhtar has to appear before the Mulund court on March 31, he added.

Also read: Here's what Javed Akhtar wrote about Satish Kaushik on Twitter

The complainant, who claims to be an RSS supporter, had alleged Akhtar, with a view to gain political score, unnecessarily dragged the name of the RSS and defamed the organisation in a "calculated and well planned move" while making the remarks during a television interview.

The statements made by the accused during the interview were aimed at defaming the Nagpur-headquartered Hindutva organisation as well as to discourage and misguide people who have joined the RSS or would like to join the outfit, the complaint had alleged.

Akhtar had made the controversial remarks in the backdrop of the Taliban seizing power in Afghanistan in August 2021.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.