03 May,2021 03:50 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Bombay High Court. File pic
Senior IPS officer Rashmi Shukla moved the Bombay High Court on Monday, seeking no coercive action against her in connection with an FIR registered by Mumbai police in a case of illegal phone tapping and alleged leaking of sensitive documents related to police postings.
Shukla's advocate Sameer Nangre sought an urgent hearing of the plea, saying the petitioner, a senior IPS officer of 1988 cadre, was apprehending arrest in the case. Nangre also sought a direction to the police to not take any coercive action against Shukla.
"The approach of the State is to arm-twist the petitioner by a bogus and frivolous case," the plea alleged. Shukla is currently serving as additional director general of the Central Reserve Police Force's (CRPF) South Zone and is posted in Hyderabad.
An FIR was registered under the Official Secrets Act at the BKC cyber police station in Mumbai against unidentified persons for allegedly tapping phones illegally and leaking certain confidential documents on the complaint filed by the Maharashtra Intelligence Department.
ALSO READ
Rashmi Shukla reappointed as Maharashtra DGP, days after her transfer
Malad woman gets her Rs 30 lakh jewellery four months after they were stolen
Son of Sardaar 2 makers deny links to director accused in assault case
Colaba wall art honors 26/11 bravery, celebrates Mumbai’s resilience
Dharavi woman, 26, killed in truck -scooter collision
The alleged tapping of phones had taken place when Shukla headed the state intelligence department. BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis had cited a letter purportedly written by Shukla to the then Director General of Police about alleged corruption in police transfers.
The letter also had details of intercepted calls, leading to an uproar with leaders of the Shiv Sena-led ruling coalition alleging that Shukla tapped phones without permission.
Before registration of the FIR, Maharashtra Chief Secretary Sitaram Kunte had alleged in a report submitted to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray that it appears that Shukla herself had leaked the confidential report (to Fadnavis).
Last month, the police issued two summons (on April 26 and April 28) to Shukla, asking her to appear before the BKC cyber department in Mumbai for recording her statement. However, Shukla had skipped the summons.
On Monday, her advocate filed an application before the HC's registrar, seeking an urgent hearing of the petition on May 4 before a division bench of Justices S S Shinde and Manish Pitale.
"The petitioner (Shukla) begs to approach the court for urgent reliefs of order of no coercive action by the police in the concerned FIR registered by the Cyber Crime Department, Mumbai," the application said.
It said Shukla exposed the alleged nexus between ministers and politicians and other gross corruption involved in assigning postings to police officers.
"This reveals the courage and integrity of the petitioner in performing her official duties and making her best endeavours to expose and eliminate corruption by bringing the guilty to book," the application said.
Instead of applauding and appreciating the work of the petitioner, the "government authorities are involved in framing the petitioner in a false criminal case", it alleged.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever