12 September,2022 07:43 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Representational Pic
The Bombay High Court on Monday asked what was the public interest in releasing an accused from jail and dismissed a public interest petition seeking direction to the Maharashtra government to release prisoners who are languishing in jails despite securing bail due to inability to pay the surety amount.
The PIL, filed by one Archana Rupwate, had also sought directions to magistrates and police stations to comply with provisions of Section 41A of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which lays down a notice shall be issued first to a person named as accused in a case and he or she shall be arrested only when required.
A division bench of Justices A S Gadkari and M N Jadhav wondered how the issues raised in the petition were in public interest and asked if releasing persons accused of crime and criminals back into the society was in public interest.
"What is the public interest in releasing the accused from jail? What is the interest in releasing the criminals?" Justice Gadkari asked.
ALSO READ
Maharashtra Elections: No illegality in mobile phone ban at polling booths: HC
No urgent hearing on plea against appointment of Rashmi Shukla as DGP: HC
Bombay HC refuses to stay release of movie on 2008 Malegaon blast
Hawker menace: Lawyers cite Mid-Day Borivli report in Bombay High Court
This Borivali hawker market has killed several BEST services
Also Read: Find where are film producer Mushtaq Nadiadwala's children: Bombay HC to Centre
The petitioner claimed police authorities were not complying with orders and guidelines issued by the Supreme Court on arrest of persons.
The bench asked the petitioner how it was presumed the directions of the apex court were not being complied with, adding if this had been verified.
"Tell us in which cases these provisions have not been complied with. This is all vague. We are dismissing it...this is sheer abuse," the court said.
The HC said neither the SC directions nor CrPC section 41A prohibits police from arresting a person.
The bench said the petitioner was unable to submit how the present PIL affects public at large.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
