20 March,2021 07:45 AM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Photo used for representational purpose
The Bombay High Court has held that a daughter can question in court the validity of her father's second marriage. In a judgement pronounced on Wednesday, a bench of Justices RD Dhanuka and VG Bisht allowed the plea filed by a 66-year-old woman challenging a family court order that held only parties to a marriage could challenge the validity of the marriage.
As per the judgement, the woman filed a plea in the family court in 2016, challenging the validity of her late father's second marriage.
In the plea, she said her father had remarried after her mother's death in 2003, but it was in 2016, after her father's death, that she realised her father's second wife was yet to finalise her divorce from her previous marriage.
Her father's second marriage, therefore, could not be considered as valid, the woman said in her plea. The second wife, however, argued before the family court that the petitioner had no locus standi in the matter as only the two parties to a marriage, that is the husband and the wife, could challenge its validity in court.
ALSO READ
Bombay High Court grants six-month bail to pregnant woman in drug case
Mumbai: Money laundering case accused cites newly-enacted law to get bail
HC seeks probe details of atrocities case filed by Sameer Wankhede against Malik
19 years after the Mumbai's 2005 deluge, pumping station cleared
HC dismisses election petition filed against Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Dina Patil
The HC, however, held that the petitioner discovered the truth about the woman's divorce much after her father's death and that she had approached the family court as soon as she learned of the discrepancy.
Since her father was dead, it was for her to bring the discrepancy forward and challenge the validity of such a marriage, the court said.
The bench said the family court was wrong in holding that the daughter was barred from questioning the validity of her father's marriage. It sent the plea back to the family court to decide afresh.
"We cannot concur with the reasoning and conclusion arrived at by the learned Family Court which wrongly dismissed the appellant's petition," the HC said.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever
