03 January,2025 06:18 PM IST | Thane | mid-day online correspondent
Representational Pic
A Thane court acquitted six persons, including a former corporator, who were booked under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly extorting and assaulting a mobile shop owner, citing "lack of evidence" and "procedural lapses" by the prosecution, news agency PTI reported.
The special court hearing MCOCA cases in Thane district delivered the judgment on Wednesday, giving the accused a "benefit of doubt" for the above reasons as well as for "unreliable testimonies" of witnesses, reported PTI.
In 2022, a first information report (FIR) was registered at the Mahatma Phule Chowk Police Station in Kalyan. The accused were booked for extortion, attempted murder and involvement in an organised crime syndicate.
The accused have been identified as Satej alias Bala Suresh Pokal, 30; former Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation corporator and construction contractor Sachin Samsan Khema, 44; Nitin Samsan Khema, 41; agriculturist Prem Haribhau Chaudhari, 33; Tohit alias Bablu Majid Shaikh, 24, and construction supervisor Ganesh Vilas Rokade, 29, PTI reported.
ALSO READ
Thane court acquits 10 accused in 2016 murder case after investigation flaws
Thane court acquits four accused in 2011 dacoity case over lack of evidence
Baba Siddique murder: Crime Branch struggling to establish Lawrence Bishnoi link
Thane court acquits 7 booked in MCOCA case
Baba Siddique murder: MCOCA court remands 8 accused in judicial custody
Advocates Poonit Mahimkar and Saghar Kolhe, representing the accused, vehemently contested the prosecution's charges and raised questions over the investigation.
In January 2022, the accused had allegedly demanded Rs 5 lakh from the complainant to allow him to operate his business and threatened him with dire consequences if he failed to do so.
The prosecution claimed that the accused assaulted the complainant and his friends with weapons, leading to serious injuries.
However, Special MCOCA Court Judge Amit M Shete there were several significant shortcomings in the prosecution's case.
According to PTI, the judge highlighted the "substantial delay" in sending crucial seized articles to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL).
The court observed that the "seized articles were forwarded to FSL almost three months after their seizure, raising the possibility of tampering. This delay severely undermines the prosecution's version."
The judge also noted that the prosecution's witnesses, including the complainant and injured parties, failed to provide consistent accounts.
"The informant and injured witnesses failed to stick to their own version and could not assign any specific role to the accused. Their silence on critical aspects casts serious doubt on the credibility of their testimonies," the judge said.
The court found the chargesheets submitted by the prosecution from previous cases against the accused to establish their involvement in organised crime, insufficient.
"The burden of proving the alleged offences beyond all reasonable doubt rests on the prosecution. Despite opportunities, they failed to produce key witnesses, including officers who recorded confessional statements," the court said.
The court addressed the confessional statement of one accused, Satej Pokal, which was not retracted, PTI stated.
"Though the statement was not retracted, it was not proved in accordance with the law and is insufficient to convict the accused for serious crimes," the judgement said.
Considering the "lack of direct evidence, procedural lapses and unreliable testimonies", the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt, reported PTI.
"On the basis of the evidence presented, it is not safe to convict the accused. The prosecution has failed to establish the charges under both the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and MCOCA," the court said.
(With inputs from PTI)
