Saksham Singhal
Artificial Intelligence is reshaping the world of finance, heading toward more efficiency and customization. From robo-advisors to AI-driven trading systems, humanizing AI is supposed to enrich the user experience. However, there exist huge risks and dark sides to the approach that must be highlighted. Saksham Singhal, a technology enthusiast and science student from Delhi Public School, R. K. Puram with expertise in programming, research, 3D/graphic design puts a light on Humanizing AI in the Financial World: The Dark Side.
The humanization of AI can make users vulnerable to manipulation and strengthen behavioral biases:
Behavioral Manipulation: AI systems that imitate human interaction can be used to manipulate psychological vulnerabilities. For example, chatbots or Robo-advisors that use persuasive language might push investors to make decisions in favour of the institution rather than the individual. This will result in a conflict of interest and a possible exploitation of investors' emotions.
Reinforcement of Biases: Since AI systems mimic human behaviour, this can further increase existing biases in markets. Trading algorithms, based on historical trends, can exaggerate market movements and enhance volatility and systemic risks.
Humanized AI generally requires far-reaching data collection, hence raising privacy and security concerns:
AI financial systems collect sensitive personal data to perform their duties efficiently. The human-like interacting system may lead users to give out more of their personal information and increase privacy risks. This can be misused when unauthorised parties gain access to the data with possible breaches and identity thefts.
Data Security: An AI system with huge financial data presents a good target for cyber-attacks. On the other hand, humanised AI tools can retain more sensitive information, and thus the impacts of data breaches are higher with an increased risk of financial fraud.
Humanising AI can result in over-reliance and systemic risks:
Over-Reliance on AI Systems: One may become over dependent on AI tools that merely duplicate human judgement.This may lead to a waning of critical thinking and classical financial analysis, which creates possible blind spots due to overreliance. For instance, biased data can cause automated trading systems to make bad investment decisions.
Systemic Risk: The use of human-like AI algorithms creates systemic risk.That is, the adoption of comparable AI systems across various institutions, can lead to correlated market behaviors, which would amplify the financial crisis and other dislocations in the markets.
Humanising AI creates ethical and accountability challenges:
Ethical Conflicts: Systems that are artificially intelligent and act as human-like interfaces could result in a conflict of interest. If an AI system gives advice that serves more in the interest of the financial institution rather than the client, then that translates to ethical breach and exploitation.
Challenges of Accountability: It can be generally difficult to trust anybody for decisions involving the work of AI systems that behave like a human. Therefore, in case of wrong trades or faulty advice by an AI-driven tool, holding somebody responsible for the mistake can be tricky. This will open up avenues of disputes, and hence, affected people are left with no remedial solution.
The adoption of human-like AI within finance may lead to job displacement and erosion of skills:
Job Displacement: Human-like AI that provides automation can replace roles traditionally held by humans. AI can turn out to be better financial advisors, analysts and business-oriented positions than most people, hence rendering them jobless and lowering opportunities for promotion.
Skill Erosion: In the process of AI performing all tasks, there is the likelihood that these critical thinking and analytical skills that many financial professionals were endowed with will be at stake. Human interactions and the quality of abilities to cope with complex financial situations without the aid of AI will be reduced.
Humanising AI affects transparency and builds trust:
Lack of Transparency: Most AI systems, specifically the ones based on deep learning, act like "black boxes" that make their inner workings impossible to know. This impairs users' understanding of decision-making and whether they accord them fair treatment.
Trust Issues: One can find out that his/her interactions with human-like AI were manipulated or not as real as one thought and this could erode the trust in financial institutions. This trust may be hard to rebuild, especially for customer loyalty.
Ethical Guidelines and Regulations: There is a dire need for clear ethical guidelines and regulations regarding manipulation, privacy, and accountability issues. These regulatory bodies should make sure that AI systems across the board work transparently and fairly.
Data Protection Measures: To protect personal and financial information, robust data protection measures would be required. Data security has to be at the forefront of the considerations by financial institutions if they wish to protect users from breaches and misuse.
Human Oversight: Human oversight in AI-driven financial decision-making can avoid extreme dependence and secure a place for critical thinking and ethical consideration. In that sense, a mix of AI tools with human judgment will be able to balance efficiency with accountability.
Humanising AI in finance creates room for improved user experiences but unleashes relevant dangers: manipulation, privacy problems, job losses, and black-box issues. It is by ethical guiding principles that respect robust data protection and human supervision that the financial industry will be able to leverage the benefits brought by AI, curbing its possible adverse effects.
For More information please visit:
