25 January,2024 12:16 PM IST | MUMBAI | BrandMedia
Srijan Tiwari, Advocate
India's pharmaceutical sector, a key contributor to the nation's economy, has encountered significant legal challenges influencing its growth trajectory.
This article explores multifaceted legal issues, with a focus on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The introduction of product patents in 2005, in alignment with the TRIPS agreement, marked a crucial shift, allowing protection for innovative products but raising concerns about affordable access to medicines. The industry also faced debates around "evergreening," a strategy accused of limiting generic competition and maintaining high drug prices.
Compulsory licensing under India's Patents Act added another layer of complexity. This provision permits the issuance of licenses, particularly during public health emergencies or instances of non-affordability. Granting compulsory licenses to produce generic versions of patented drugs has led to tensions between multinational pharmaceutical companies and Indian authorities.
Balancing data exclusivity, protecting clinical trial data, and ensuring timely access to generic drugs is a delicate task crucial for fostering innovation and affordability in medicine. The pharmaceutical sector in India faces challenges beyond patents, including combating counterfeit drugs, which necessitates safeguarding intellectual property rights while addressing public health risks associated with fake medications.
Patent litigations are common, with generic manufacturers challenging multinational companies to expedite the entry of affordable generic versions. Concerns persist that stringent IP laws may hinder innovation, emphasizing the need for a delicate balance between incentives for research and development and ensuring widespread access to medicines. India's stance on intellectual property rights sometimes strains global trade relations, requiring ongoing negotiations to align with international standards while safeguarding public health interests.
Moving beyond intellectual property, regulatory compliance stands as a formidable challenge for the pharmaceutical industry in India. Operating within a highly regulated environment, companies must navigate a complex web of regulations and compliance requirements set by authorities such as the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). This central regulatory authority, under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, formulates policies, enforces regulations, and approves licenses for the manufacture, sale, and distribution of drugs.
The Drug and Cosmetic Act, 1940, serves as the primary legislation governing pharmaceuticals in India, laying down the regulatory framework for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of drugs. Compliance with this act empowers regulatory authorities to ensure adherence to quality standards and safety requirements. Pharmaceutical companies must adhere to a rigorous approval process for new drugs, involving comprehensive data submission on pre-clinical and clinical trials to the CDSCO.
GMP regulations mandate consistent production and control of pharmaceuticals according to quality standards, a requirement for obtaining and retaining a manufacturing license. Ethical and safety aspects of human clinical research are governed by the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, with DCGI approval as a prerequisite. Pharmaceutical companies must establish pharmacovigilance systems for continuous monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions to assess the safety profile of marketed drugs.
Schedule M of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules outlines the requirements for manufacturing premises, plant, and equipment. Compliance with these requirements is essential for obtaining and maintaining a manufacturing license for pharmaceutical products. Drug Price Control Orders (DPCO) regulate the prices of essential medicines, controlling profit margins for pharmaceutical companies and ensuring affordability and accessibility of essential drugs.
The pharmaceutical supply chain is subject to stringent regulatory controls, including import and export regulations, licensing requirements, and adherence to labeling standards.
The debated concept of data exclusivity involves delicately balancing the protection of clinical trial data with promoting competition for timely access to generic drugs.
Intentionally producing or distributing substandard drugs can lead to criminal charges such as fraud, conspiracy, and even manslaughter if patient harm occurs, while civil liability exposes manufacturers and distributors to lawsuits seeking compensation for injuries. Product liability claims add complexity to legal challenges.
Substandard drugs may involve unauthorized copying or infringement of patented medications, triggering intellectual property lawsuits by original manufacturers. The intricate pharmaceutical supply chain complicates accountability, extending to manufacturers, distributors, and other entities.
Internationally, addressing substandard drugs necessitates collaborative efforts to harmonize regulations and combat global circulation. Counterfeiting laws play a vital role in penalizing unauthorized reproduction and distribution of medications.
